Hi,
SQL Server 2K Enterprise Ed, running Transactional replication, four
articles being replicated, 1 article containing over 15 million rows.
That table has 4 indexes on it. I created a job that executes a DBCC
INDEXDEFRAG statement against each of the indecies, I run the job at
the weekend, the job never errors, however it kills the Trans
replication.
What am I doing wrong? I used INDEXDEFRAG because of its online
capabilities, but the replication still fails.
Cheers
Scott
Are you having a problem with the Log Reader agent?
If so the problem is that Index Defragging is a logged operation and your
Tlog will balloon. This puts stress on your log reader agent and you will
see that it will experience time outs. The best way to fix this is to change
your Log Reader Agent's PollingInterval - set it to 1, and change the
ReadBatchSize - probably to 50 when you are doing the defragging. When you
not, use the defaults. Using profiles is an excellend way to do this.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
<quackhandle1975@.yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1108472684.342558.177210@.z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi,
> SQL Server 2K Enterprise Ed, running Transactional replication, four
> articles being replicated, 1 article containing over 15 million rows.
> That table has 4 indexes on it. I created a job that executes a DBCC
> INDEXDEFRAG statement against each of the indecies, I run the job at
> the weekend, the job never errors, however it kills the Trans
> replication.
> What am I doing wrong? I used INDEXDEFRAG because of its online
> capabilities, but the replication still fails.
> Cheers
> Scott
>
Monday, March 19, 2012
Indexing on large table kills Transactional Replication
Labels:
article,
containing,
database,
enterprise,
fourarticles,
indexing,
kills,
microsoft,
million,
mysql,
oracle,
replicated,
replication,
rows,
running,
server,
sql,
table,
transactional
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment