I have a database(SQL2000) with two file group(on seperate physical
drives).
One is meant for table data[PRIMARY] and one for indexes [INDEX].
So i create a table on the [PRIMARY] file group, and fill in
data.
Next I build a clustered index on the table, on the [INDEX] filegroup.
Once the index is built, the database now indicates that the filegroup
for the table [INDEX]! and not [PRIMARY] as i originally set it up for!
My question it then: Has the table been moved or is this somehow an
error in SQL server?
I would really appreciate any thought anyone might have on this?Jens
A clustered index is the table (Well not quiet, but close enough). It
is impossible to have a clustered index on a different filegroup from
the data. You can build non-clustered on a seperate filegroup.
I suggest you rebuild your clustered index on your primary filegroup.
Regards
John|||Aha! Solved some mysteries for me :-). Thank you very much.
I guess i didnt quite understand how clustered indexes worked.
Actually i have a bunch of tables with clustered indexes which
currently reside my file group for indexes. The good news is,if I
understand you correctly,
the if I simply rebuild the clustered index on my data file group
the table data will be moved back.|||Jens
Yes, rebuilding the clustered index will move the table. You can also
do it through enterprise manager, using design table, this rebuilds the
index for you.
Regards
John|||Im planning to recreate the clustered index like this:
CREATE
CLUSTERED INDEX [idx-clusteredindex]
ON
[dbo].[TABLE_NAME]([COLOUMN_NANE])
WITH
DROP_EXISTING,
FILLFACTOR = 90
ON
[PRIMARY]
As I understand this will alse cause all non-clustered index
on the table to be rebuilt/recalculated as well.
Is this infact the case of do I have to
do i have to do it explicitly afterwards like:
DBCC DBREINDEX ([dbo].[TABLE_NAME],[idx-nonclustered],90)
johnbandettini@.yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Jens
> Yes, rebuilding the clustered index will move the table. You can also
> do it through enterprise manager, using design table, this rebuilds
the
> index for you.
>
> Regards
>
> John
No comments:
Post a Comment